Monday, March 25, 2013

Blog 23 - March 25, 2013

Hola Homies!

More on the house of the future . . .

Popular Science has been exploring future technology pretty much since time began. Over the years there have been MANY instances of new home technology. Both inside the home, and the home in general.

Please READ the following article. You remember reading don't you? You know, that thing your parents and teachers taught you to do long ago? Yeah. Do that. And then click on the photo gallery and view the 10 photos of alternate housing developments.

For credit this week you will pick one of the featured housing developments, tell us which one,  and give at least one reason why it wouldn't work.

As always (unless we're on ThinkGeek) read Tuesday, blog Thursday.

The following article is from Popular Science:

Going by our archives, the only thing more hyped-up than flying cars and humanoid robot assistants were cool futuristic homes -- homes that could converge their walls to create new rooms, that could adapt to any environment, and that could play with your children while you took an afternoon nap. In terms of functionality, houses of today haven't changed much over the past fifty years. We still use good old brick, marble and cement as building materials. We still turn the microwave and TV on by our ourselves. For the most part, we still do our own chores. So what happened?


The future that never was makes our Roombas and plasma TVs sound a little quaint, doesn't it? We're happy to report, though, that we have plenty of reasons to feel content with our non-computerized houses. In April 1956, a group of researchers at MIT tested plastic houses, the draw being that plastic walls would be easy to hose down on cleaning days. A couple of decades later, Goodyear began testing air-bubble houses, which would situate your family within an unnervingly spacious translucent dome. These days, neither sound particularly appealing, given their vulnerability to natural disasters and local hooligans.

Dismally enough, we predicted in 1982 that in order to conserve natural resources, people living in the year 2000 would be forced to use low-flush toilets and "miserly" shower heads. As much as we love robots and computer-controlled appliances here at PopSci, we'll profess to choosing hot showers over talking microwaves any day of the week.


In some cases, we dreamed too big, perhaps spiraling into ideas that were decades ahead of their time. In the early 1980s, a band of designers at the Illinois Institute of Technology predicted that by the mid-1990s, we'd be using computers to build fully computerized, shippable, energy-efficient modular housing units. Microprocessors would control the appliances and adjust the ambiance, while robots would hang the laundry. Humans, meanwhile, would lounge around the indoor spas (alas, still not a standard feature) in between watching programs on holographic television sets.

Hanging House: February 1939


Paul Nelson, a modernist American architect and renowned Francophile, imbued his work with a "quality of mechanical lyricism," as described by British architect Kenneth Frampton. His cagey design for a suspended steel house featured upper rooms that hung from the ceiling and connected by ramps. The structure itself was supported by U-shape tubular steel arches, and although you can't see it in this black-and-white photo, the steel mesh was covered in diamond-shaped glass panes that were opaque from the outside. The kitchen, laundry, and other service rooms (we'll assume that means a garage), were located on the ground floor, while the bath and bedrooms were at the top. The study, living room and recreation facilities could be found in the middle.


Floating Homes: March 1941

 

Now here's a solution to overcrowding. During the early 1930s, several Miami residents built floating homes in Biscayne Bay, where renting an acre's worth of water space cost a mere dollar. Residents built their houses on atop pilings. Some people even constructed sharkproof swimming pools by enclosing small areas with underwater fences. At its peak, the Biscayne Bay neighborhood boasted 27 houses, which were used a summer getaways and fun places for dinners and fish-frys.



Sadly, the idea never really caught on, and the neighborhood went into decline once the novelty wore off. Its location 10 miles from the downtown Miami shores meant that residents had no access to electricity. They needed to transport their own light sources to stay there at night. Exposure to the elements and the susceptibility to hurricanes took their toll on the buildings, and eventually their number dwindled to seven. These days, the area is called Stiltsville, and the buildings are owned by the National Park Service.




Stopgap Housing: March 1946


To solve the housing crisis, the Federal Public Housing Authority (FPHA) briefly distributed stopgap homes, or temporary shelters that provided the would-be homeless veterans with a place to live while they looked for permanent quarters. Residents of the Navy's Homoja village in Annapolis lived in 20-by-48-foot steel Quonset huts. Homes were compact and came with only the most basic furniture. Best of all, families paid only $1 a day for rent.


Elsewhere, surplus Army barracks were being converted into veterans' housing, while Congress moved 100,000 stopgap housing units (leftover from the war) to new sites. These houses were of light frame construction and could be dismantled for shipment. As cheap and convenient as those structures sounded, city planners were concerned that these units would either turn into slums or that they would compete with private housing. Stopgap housing advocates stood their ground, though, insisting that states and localities construct temporary housing or else neglect the millions of veterans coming home from the war.


   

Plastic House: April 1956


According to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the house of the future would be plastic, mass-produced and shaped like a cross. The basic floorplan would consist of a core and four "wings." The kitchen, bathrooms and furnace would be housed inside the core, while the plastic wings would hold the bedroom, dining, office and recreational areas. The entire structure would be mounted atop a pedestal, making the house look as if it were floating above ground.


So, why plastic? Firstly, it's low-maintenance. To clean your house, hose down the walls. To repair cracks or patch the room, slap some cement into the wounds an consider the job done. Of course, there were a couple of problems, the biggest one being that plastic can become deformed when exposed to heat. MIT did assure us, however, that the designs were experimental, and the purpose of a plastic house was to help designers evaluate plastic as a standard building material

 

 Air-Bubble Sun Port: January 1961

All right, you can't live day in and day out in an air house, but for just $50, it can become a charming addition to your home. We proposed using it as a game room, a photo studio, a pool cover, or an outdoor family playroom that would let you picnic out in the yard even in the dead of winter.

The filmy plastic air bubble was easy enough to erect. It required no frame and was supported entirely by air. Like a greenhouse, it trapped enough solar heat to let temperatures rise to around 80 or 90 degrees. You can even add a small electric heater to keep things toasty on gloomy afternoons.

To inflate the air house, we wrote, use a small blower (vacuum cleaners and hair dryers work if you're desperate) and let it run continuously. A self-balancing vent on the side of the dome controls the airflow by opening and closing according to the rise and fall of pressure.



Bubble Buildings: May 1973

About a decade after we sang praises for the air bubble sun port, Goodyear actually tested a residential air structure for family use. David and Vickie Schumacher, pictured above, participated in Goodyear's experiment by liveing in this part translucent, part transparent home. Some areas, like the living room, had a floor, while others were left as grass and dirt. Although the Schumachers enjoyed the sunlight and how they could watch the rain falling on the roof, they found the open space and lack of privacy unnerving. David also professed to suffering from "bubble fever," which is like reverse cabin fever.


After returning to Princeton to finish his graduate studies, David organized a non-profit student housing group to develop designs for a residential campus contained within an air bubble. In his proposal, students would live within stackable "roommettes," which could be connected and transported like blocks within the air structure.


 

 Computerized House: January 1980

"He's a butler, babysitter, companion--and sometimes a nuisance," we wrote when describing Breslin, a computerized house that could do everything from talking to the kids to controlling the garage door. He could tell the time, predict the weather, print out bank balances and communicate with other computers to retrieve news headlines or information from the homeowner's address books.

 


Breslin, who was programmed by Bill Hawkins, was a personal project more than a commercial venture. That didn't mean others wouldn't feel inspired and follow suit, though. In this article, Hawkins described how Breslin would follow one of four preprogrammed schedules, which would tell him when to turn on and off the lights, and how to adjust the temperature. Despite being a computer, Breslin had a deeply personal relationship to his owner. In the morning, he would wake Hawkins up by reading him his appointments and turning on the radio.

 

Since this was the year 1980, you can imagine how much work went into creating Bresin out of an IMSAI 8080 computer. His actual "Home" program was just 52 kilobytes and could load into the computer using the North Star Disk System. A Lear Siegler terminal let Hawkins send and receive data through that system.

  

Autonomous Dwelling Vehicle: April 1980

"Was this the American home of the future--this cross between a submarine and a World War II Quonset hut, this metal half-sausage afloat on a sea of mud?" we asked, when we saw Ted Bakewell II and Michael E. Jantzen's Autonomous Dwelling Vehicle. It certainly espoused the aesthetic and conservation technologies of 1980s house-of-the-future concepts, but its inventors insisted that the house-vehicle hybrid was more of a mobile home than anything. The structure was light enough to be towed long distances. It could float on water and be carried around by a helicopter. As a conservationist, Jantzen helped ensure that the house could run without fossil fuels and hookups to electricity, gas, water, and sewage. As you can see on the left, solar photovoltaic panels generated the structure's power.

 


The inside of the structure was quite roomy, and if anything, resembled the inside of the air-bubble structures from a decade prior. The home included a dining area, bedroom, bath and food-service area. While preparing meals, the inventors cooked on a renewable fuel stove. A tiny refrigerator could use outside winter air and a solid-state thermionic device to stay cool. The toilet, meanwhile, was of the waterless waste-composing type.


  

Dynamic House: April 1984

Now this is a house we'd love to live in. Professor Charles Owen from the Illinois Institute of Technology worked with a team of students to design a prefabricated house that could adapt to the weather, expand and contract, program indoor environments, and order around robotic servants that could do your chores. Solar-hydrogen-wind-turbine modules on the roof would generate energy while windows would automatically adjust to to sunlight. The computer-generated designs focused not on houses as a whole, but on on components that could even be installed into existing structures. Pictured at left is the entertainment center, where a family can enjoy programs on a holographic TV set. Other rooms of the house contain moving walls and panels that for enclosing bedrooms or bath areas. Although his design is advanced even for the year 2011, Professor Owens and his team were confident that people would be able to use their technology by the mid-1990s.


  
 Home of the Year 2000: May 1982

When it came to houses, we dreamed big in the 1980s. We predicted that by the year 2000, Americans would favor clustered townhouses over the typical suburban house-and-yard model. The houses would draw most of their energy from renewable sources, and families will trade luxury showers for "miserly shower heads" and low-flush toilets. As we run out of land space, we'll move our housing underground, "to take advantage of Mother Earth's even temperature."

John R. Hagley of the Battelle Columbus Labs said that by the year 2000, houses would plug heating, cooling, plumbing and electricity into one power unit. Futuristic insulation and glazing materials, like electrochromic gas, would conserve energy even further. Aside from environmentally-friendly materials, residents could enjoy technologies like flat-screen TVs and voice-command family computers.



Talk to me . . .

71 comments:

Anonymous said...

i think the plastic house idea is stupid because plastic tends to expand and shrink when it gets cold and hot outside and then it tends to warp. i dont know about you but i dont want my house to shrink and expand and warp.

haley gresham-1st

Anonymous said...

I think that a floating home is a bad idea for house because it doesn't have electricity.It would work as a place to stay for the day, but not for permanent housing.

Anonymous said...

I think the floating homes is a pretty stupid idea. For one who wants to live one water, and I would constntly ave the feeling like a shark is swimming under my house.

Kevin Mitchell, 1st

Anonymous said...

I think that a floating home is a bad idea for a house because it doesn't have electricity.It would work as a place to stay for the day, but not for permanent housing.

Stroup 1st

Anonymous said...

i think the plastic house is a dumb idea because when it gets hot it would melt or shrink personally i woulnt live in a plastic house


geovanni alfaro 1st

Anonymous said...

I like the idea of the floating homes, i think is cool but it wouldn't last long due to the hurricanes.

jose gonzalez-1st

Anonymous said...

The Bubble Air Port seems like the dumbest idea ever, why would you want to have an enclosed area of plastic over your head. The reason it fails miserably: If you want to say cook some delicious omelets and on the side BBQ, the smoke and smell that would come out of the kitchen would completely suffocate you and your family. Worse then that, what if someone was having some stomach problems. See bubble house, not such a good idea.
Valencia 8th

Anonymous said...

i do no think that the computerized house is not an ok idea because the fact that a computer is the one playing with my child really scares me because i dont trust robots at all!!

nolan-1st

Anonymous said...

I think the plastic house wouldn't work because when the sun is out the house would heat up.
Reyes-1st

Anonymous said...

i think the plastic house has to be the dumbest thing ive ever heard of, because plastic will both expand and shrink depending on the weather. the idea of my home shrinking while im in it freaks me out
brooke whitaker 1st

Anonymous said...

I think the floating house is a bad idea. First, you dont have electricty.Second, i would feel sea sick with the waves and such! Lastly, to me it would be used more as a day trip and not as a permanent stay.

Hailey Woods
2

Anonymous said...

i think the floating homes is a bad idea because if a storm comes through the house would mostlikely be flipped
Delton Scott 2nd

Anonymous said...

I like the air bubble house, it sooooo cool, like it could be snowing outside and then you would be really warm in like your bathing suit,but it wouldnt work because if you were say cooking in there the smoke would fill up the bubble...and if it had windows it would make it cold in the house, but it is still cool!

Emily Wallace 2nd

Anonymous said...

I chose the Plastic House. This will not work because the plactic can be deformed when its exposed to heat. With the heat thats in Texas you would most like be sucked together cause your plastic house will be collapsed.

Raven R. Moore, 2nd

Anonymous said...

Okay, the floating home idea is super dumb because the people that would live in that house wouldn't have access to electricity and what if a bad storm comes through and just tears your house to pieces? You would be in a really sticky situation.

Nichole Marshall, 2nd period

Anonymous said...

I think the Dynamic House: April 1984 is pretty stupid.. We thought we would be able to do this by mid 1990's? Think again.. Try adding another 100 years.. Soo maybe it wont work becuase we cant make it work!

Tyvan Tipps, 2nd

Anonymous said...

i think a floating house would be horrible because first of all you would have to go on a boat to your house and another thing is that there might be shark out there uhm no !


Maryori Giron
2nd period

Anonymous said...

I like the floating house just to have that feeling when you live in one of thosse houses, but in other words i could stay one night because i reaslly dont see myself living there.
-karen torres 2nd

Anonymous said...

I chose the plastic house because there is several reasons why that mess wouldnt work. Speaking for myself I am EXTREMELY destructive the first time I attempt to microwave some popcorn "SET FIRE TO THE RAIN" By Adele is gonna start playing because its about to get real. Then theres the fact that what yall gone do when another hurricane or tornado decides to pay you a visit?...you gone wake up just like Dorothy did in Wizard of Oz taliking bout "Toto I dont think were in Texas anymore. Im just saying.

Mikaela Period 2

Anonymous said...

I think that the Bubble Building idea of 1973 wouldn't be a good idea because it doesnt't have a great deal of privacy. I have a tendency to stay in my room secluded which couldn't happen in this building. Which is why I could understand the Schumacher's having "bubble fever."

Woodson~2

Anonymous said...

i think the plastic house is cool and stupid at the same time. Unfortunately it's not a good idea because when summer comes its going to be really hot and when plastic is exposed to heat it begins to warp and be weird.

Ka'Lyn Gladney 2nd

Anonymous said...

The idea that a house should be made of plastic is kinda stupid. plastic is flimsy and not vary solid. So could a plastic house stand up to harsh weather? probaly not.
Grayson Skimdore 2nd.

Anonymous said...

I think the Computerized House is a dumb idea. The house might think its "incharge". I mean has anyone ever watched the movie "Smart House"? The house went crazy.

Gabriel Garrett 2

Anonymous said...

i picked the floating home, i think that is so not a good idea. it wouldnt work because for one there wouldnt be any electricity and if a storm came through the house would flood with water and probably sink . so i totally think the floating home is not a good idea.

kadejiaflanagan
2nd

Anonymous said...

I chose the Dynamic House. It wouldn't work because we can't even get the AC to work right!!!! Ok someday we will evolve beyond the challange of the AC, but the real reason why this wouldn't work is what if every person is the family wants to be in a different room at the same time. The house would FREAK!!!

Anonymous said...

The floating houses would be bad for people in America because of Hurricanes and people that cant swim. Instead of a rich guy walking to his lamborghini he would walk to his expense speed boat. but if you wreck hope you can swim if not DEATH!!!

Anonymous said...

I chose the Dynamic House. It wouldn't work because we can't even get the AC to work right!!!! Ok someday we will evolve beyond the challange of the AC, but the real reason why this wouldn't work is what if every person is the family wants to be in a different room at the same time. The house would FREAK!!!

SDPearson 2nd Period

Anonymous said...

The floating houses would be bad for people in America because of Hurricanes and people that cant swim. Instead of a rich guy walking to his lamborghini he would walk to his expense speed boat. but if you wreck hope you can swim if not DEATH!!!

Andrew Gipson
2nd

Anonymous said...

i chose the Bubble Buildings of May 1973, its a nice design and goos for playful inventions but it wouldnt last long at all, and i think the probability of a hater breaking in would rise, the how would you install everyday things needed, could you even paint your walls?


Nahum 2nd p

Anonymous said...

I think the plastic house wouldn't work becuase plastic changes in different temperatures. Plus if its getting straight sunlight rays, then I'm sure the temperature inside the house is gonna double than the temperature outside. It would be like a greenhouse. I wouldn't want to live in it, I'll probably be cooked in there. D:

Eddie Ramirez - 2nd

Anonymous said...

i think theplastic house idea is horrible because like they said it expandsand shrinks but honestly how hard do you think it would be to break into it, not much.

kolten k. 2nd

Anonymous said...

i think the floating homes wouldnt be a good idea because its out in the middle of no where and having no electricity its not cool. it would be a dangerous place to be in when a hurricane is about to occur.
-karen torres 2nd

Anonymous said...

i Think the floating houses would not work because they can get damage by the any zunami.

ignacio sanchez

Anonymous said...

Floating houses is an interesting idea but, the article said that they are miles away from Miami which means they have no access to electricity for at night. Also, it's a bad hurricane zone. But, apperently the idea isn't new and there's "floating Houses" in Vietnam!

Kayleyne Beighey, Period 6

Anonymous said...

A couple of reasons that floating houses wouldn't work are the rising of sea levels, tsunamis, and storms.

Fernando Rodriguez, 6th Period

Anonymous said...

In my opinion the air bubble house is pretty cool, its okay to have one but i dont really think someone would want to live day and night in an air bubble, especially if the person is clystophobic I just think its really dumb having a bubble house.

Cruz/6

Unknown said...

I pick the floating houses because they are probably the most flaud. The house dont have electricity and the are very susceptible to hurricanes since they are in the middle of the ocean.

Anonymous said...

I think the Floating Homes because if you sprung a leak your house would sink.

Denerrell Jones 7Th

Anonymous said...

The floating homes look cool but they wouldnt work because you arent able to get electricity and if a hurricane hit the house it would completely dissappear.

Villarreal 7th

Anonymous said...

i choose the bubble buildings: may 1973. i dont think these would work because if u get a good size piece of debris and hit the bubble with it, the whole structure would collapse.

untiedt, 7th

Anonymous said...

Marisol Alvarado- 7th period
I think that the Plastic House: April 1956 is a terrible idea. With the house standing in one spot, it's constantly exposed to the sunlight. This would eventually cause discoloration and warping. Those are two things I know I would want my house to do- imagine coming home one day to a melted house!!!
Marisol Alvarado- 7th period

Anonymous said...

I think the plastic house is a bad idea becuase when it gets hot it will melt and shrink.

Anthony Martinez

7th period

Anonymous said...

Today I'm going to be talking about the plastic house. It looks pretty dope swag yolo but I think it would melt due to heat and the sun beaming down upon it.

Courtney - 7

Anonymous said...

The floating homes look really cool but if something were to happen like a major storm or tornado hit it...you would definitly be dead x(






McShan -7th

Anonymous said...

Autonomous Dwelling Vehicle: April 1980
i would say that running on electricity is a good idea but if there is no electricity . then that would mean that it will not run at all becouse everthing is manufactured with electricity
jmk
3/28/13
7th

Anonymous said...

I think that the Air-Bubble house wouldn't work because if you had something sharp you could make a hole in it.

Reyes 7th

Anonymous said...

I liked the idea of the 1980 computerized house. The main reason it wouldn't work is because if you get fired from a job or change jobs its gonna be etremly hard to change the cycle the house is on.

Tyler Johnston, 7th

Anonymous said...

The plastic house looks to me as if it could fly away into a meadow of soft flower petals swooshing in the breeze and litte butterfly whisp past you as you are suddenly hurled towards a dark forest full of bears, sloths, wolves, misquitoes, snakes, spiders and other insects that will most likely scare the pants off just about anyone until you reach the exit just to be thrown into a river that will take you down due to gravity all the way the edge of an enormous waterfall as you desperately try to cling to any survival instinct that comes to mind that could save your life but hope closes shut on you as you plummit down the rapid and furious waterfall until the house pops on impact and you lay amongst its colored rubbery shreds.

Vazquez, Manuel 7th

Lanham said...

Manny = dark and tortured soul today.

Anonymous said...

I Think The Floating House Would Be Bad A Bad Idea Around Here Because We Get Floods, Hurricanes, And Tornados That Could Get The House And Destroy It Completely.

Espino, 7th

Anonymous said...

i like the stopgap homes because they seem the most reasonable and a good idea for the ww2 vets

thomas mcclendon 7th

Anonymous said...

I dont think the computerized house is a good idea because it could mess up and then you'll be trapped.

Kline-7th

Anonymous said...

i think the floating homes idea is dumb. It has the potential to be ruined by a massive storm. Not a well thought out idea.

hill 7th

Anonymous said...

I don"t like the idea of a floating house because there is no electricity, running water, and any form of a firm house hold. And if it was hit by the storm, there will be no house. This idea is really dumb and lame!

Landeros 8th

Anonymous said...

I think the computerized house from 1980 is awesome! Basically you just talk to it and it does everything for you from waking you up to telling you when there is a fire. But, even though I think it is cool, I feel like I would get very annoyed by having a constant voice talking all through my house.

Rogers Kelsey 8

Anonymous said...

Even though the Floating Homes are a super good idea to reduce overpopulation, they simply wouldn't, and didn't, last long and be practical due to the fact that there is no electricity and the constant threat of hurricanes.

Maggie King, 8th

Anonymous said...

I think the floating homes are the dumbest thing I've seen in my life. First of all, there is no electricity, so you would have to live like a freakin caveman. Second of all is the elements. Hurricanes and storms could easily destroy the homes.

Santoyo, 8th

Anonymous said...

I think the Plastic House would be a horrible idea in Texas because it is so hot in the summer the houses would melt.

Seannah,8th

Anonymous said...

Air-Bubble Sun Port

not a very good idea because you have to keep it inflated and to do so you would have to have some motor sounding thing running all the time. how annoying, i would get so sick of the noise...

Sydney 8

Anonymous said...

the computerizsed house is kina cool, but it would realy suck if the power went out. and think of the electricity bill.!!.,


Jay Coutee
8th -*

Anonymous said...

The Air-Bubble house idea would be a horrible Idea for the Bipolar Texas weather, and would probably end up melting before you even put your furniture in it. Also it would require electricty, and would be a little better if solar powered.

antonio idalia 8th

Anonymous said...

A floating house is a cool idea, but that doesn't mean its a good one. Living without electricity and dealing with waves/hurricanes. Not the best idea

Anonymous said...

The plastic house seemed like a terrible idea! I mean for goodness sakes it's made out of plastic, that just does not seem ideal at all! It could melt if exposed to high sources of heat like i donoo.. maybe the sun?!

Geetha Pokala, 8th

Anonymous said...

A floating house is a cool idea, but that doesn't mean its a good one. Living without electricity and dealing with waves/hurricanes. Not the best idea

A floating house is a cool idea, but that doesn't mean its a good one. Living without electricity and dealing with waves/hurricanes. Not the best idea

Cody Swink 8th

Anonymous said...

Floating houses are basically retarded. What if you woke up, went outside to get some air and forgot you dont have a yard? You would fall in the lake and start off a bad day. Oh, and it woudnt be cool to be walking on the floor and fall through! On the bright side though you dont have to have a water or electric bill :D
Caymon C.
Mrs. L
8th
Thursday

Anonymous said...

(Floating Homes March 1941)

I think this idea would not work, because the residents of these neighborhoods would be isolated to the point were the wouldn't have access to electricity. With out electricy life is pretty much pointless.

Noriand Marrero 8th Period.

Anonymous said...

I think the floating homes looks cool but is a bad idea for a permanent house because you dont have any kind of electricity, or a/c, and how would you take a shower or use the restroom? D; So yeah the floating homes idea sucks.

Coulston 8th Pd.

Anonymous said...

The plastic house to me seemed like a bad idea because it would not provide as much support and protection as the wood and bricks that most of us use.

Justin Wharton 8th

Anonymous said...

To me the plastic house is the worse possible house to live in because plastic can be easily transformed using heat.. Nd on hot enviroments yu would get melted up in there so not a good idea

corpus 7th

Anonymous said...

I chose the bubble house because personally speaking, I dont want to live in a bubble. Can you say no privacy?!Sure, its cool but to live in?? No!
faith deckard , 8th period

Ian Farquhar said...

Wow - someone else who knows about Breslin. As a 13 year old kid I saw that article about Breslin, and it has captivated me ever since.

I would love to track down Bill Hawkins and find out what happened to him. The problem is that his name is so common it gets thousands of useless hits.

If anyone has any leads, please let me know!